Contact us
[email protected] | |
3275638434 | |
Paper Publishing WeChat |
Useful Links
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Article
Author(s)
LI Yongrui, HUANG Shiqing
Full-Text PDF XML 186 Views
DOI:10.17265/1537-1506/2024.03.001
Affiliation(s)
Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China; Sichuan West China Hospital Asset Management Co., Ltd.; Institute of Hospital Management, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
ABSTRACT
Due
to the complexity of leadership and its variability across situations, it is suggested
that research on leadership should focus on attempts to understand leadership in specific
situations or roles, and develop local knowledge about leadership in each
situation or role. This paper validates the possibility and importance of building
indigenous leadership theories from historical
perspective. We demonstrated how to carry out research on indigenous Chinese leadership
from a historical perspective by comparative
case studies using historical data. Based on the principles of typicalness, representativeness,
and comparativeness, we selected six counterparts of political elites in ancient
China as comparative cases, which includes Guan Zhong & Shang Yang (organizational
reformer), Liu Bang & Xiang Yu (entrepreneur), Li Shimin & Qin Shihuang
(intergenerational transition successor), Zhuge Liang & Zeng Guofan (professional
manager), Lu Su & Zhang Juzheng (mess-to-order maker), and Zuo Zongtang &
Wang Anshi (national dream driver). The paper aims to develop indigenous leadership
theory specific to Chinese mental states and culture.
KEYWORDS
historical perspective, indigenous leadership, political elites in ancient China, comparative case study, qualitative study
Cite this paper
References