 |
[email protected] |
 |
3275638434 |
 |
 |
| Paper Publishing WeChat |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Training for Vessel Collision Prevention: Circumstances and Causes of Near-Miss Incidents
Yoshiaki Kunieda1, Akihiro Nunome1, Kotaro Ito2 and Naruphun Chotechaung3
Full-Text PDF
XML 406 Views
DOI:10.17265/2328-2142/2024.06.002
1. National Institute of Technology, Toyama College, Toyama 9398630, Japan
2. Japan Agency of Maritime Education and Training for Seafarers, Yokohama 2310003, Japan
3. Faculty of International Maritime Studies, Kasetsart University, Chon Buri 20230, Thailand
Among the near-miss incidents related to the operation of training ship of the JMETS (Japan Agency of Maritime Education and Training for Seafarers), three characteristic cases were analyzed, extracting their circumstances and near-miss factors. Based on the results of these analyses, measures to prevent vessel collisions were studied, from which we proposed collision prevention training. The training entails (1) lookout training, (2) navigation planning training, (3) resource management training, and (4) false assumption prevention training. In future research, we aim to verify the effectiveness of the proposed training, improve the training’s effectiveness, and contribute to the development of effective anti-collision support devices.
Collision prevention, near-miss incidents, collision prevention measures, false assumption.
Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering 12 (2024) 264-275 doi: 10.17265/2328-2142/2024.06.002
[1] Albayrak, T., and Ziarati, R. 2012. “Encouraging Research in Maritime Education & Training.” Journal of Maritime Transport and Engineering 1 (1): 4-9.
[2] Japan Coast Guard. 2023. Japan Coast Guard Report 2022. Accessed September 15, 2024. https://www6.kaiho.mlit.go.jp/info/keihatsu/20230609_state_measure01.pdf.
[3] Amano, K., et al. 2015. “Summary of Near-Miss Reports in FY 2013.” The Journal of National Institute for Sea Training 41: 43-55.
[4] Yoshida, S. 2003. “A Study of Educational Training about a Dangerous Foresight and Risk Management for Constructive Managing Engineers.” The Society of Heating, Air-Conditioning Sanitary Engineers of Japan 3: 2037-40.
[5] Nishimura, T., and Kobayashi, H. 2009. “A Study on lookout Characteristic in Collision Avoidance-Ⅱ.” Journal of Japan Institute of Navigation 120: 81-8.
[6] Nishizaki, C., Itoh, H., and Takemoto, T. 2015. “A Study on Error Modes in Officers’ Watch Keeping Based on the Behavior Analysis.” Journal of Japan Institute of Navigation 132: 105-13.
[7] Okada, K., Fujimoto, S., Fujiwara, S., and Fuchi, M. 2015. “Evaluating Navigational Information and the Abilities of OOW Who Handle Navigational Instruments.” Journal of Japan Institute of Navigation 132: 1-8.
[8] Higaki, T., Hashimoto, H., and Yoshioka, S. 2022. “Route Optimization for Automatic Collision Avoidance Using Inverse Reinforcement Learning.” Proceedings of the Japan Society of Naval Architects and Ocean Engineers 34: 189-92.
[9] Tasaki, Y., Kashima, H., Kunieda, Y., and Takemoto, T. 2016. “The Feature of Bridge-to-Bridge Communication Using VHF in Marine Traffic Density Area.” Journal of Japan Institute of Navigation 133: 58-65.
[10] Ino, A., Fujimoto, S., and Konishi, T. 2018. “The Influence of ‘Prejudice’ on Watch-Keeping: ‘Collision Cases between Fishing Vessels and Power-Driven Vessels except Fishing Vessels’.” Journal of Japan Institute of Navigation 13: 12-9.