Paper Status Tracking
Contact us
[email protected]
Click here to send a message to me 3275638434
Paper Publishing WeChat

Article
Affiliation(s)

1. Haskell and Irene Lemon School of Construction Science, University of Oklahoma, Norman 73019, USA
2. JE Dunn Construction, Dallas 75254, USA

ABSTRACT

Working toward an efficient duration and timeline for the preconstruction phase should be one of the main objectives for project owners. Failing to plan for and coordinate preconstruction decisions in order to control preconstruction duration and manage time variances can lead to financial insecurities, incomplete contract documents, permitting issues, and unrealistic schedules and resource allocation during this phase. To minimize time variances and ensure a productive decision-making process, project owners should be familiar with critical elements in a project that cause variances in the preconstruction phase timeline. In this study, the impacts of eleven critical preconstruction elements on time variances were analyzed. These eleven preconstruction elements are considered critical in how they impact time variances during the preconstruction phase. They were determined to be critical based either on significantly impacting time variance during the preconstruction phase or believed to be critical from findings from previous studies, however, the findings from this study showed no significant impact on the time variances. In most previous studies focusing on the elements impacting projects’ schedules, data were collected by surveying construction professionals. In this study, objective and quantitative data related to project preconstruction elements were used as opposed to self-reported data. Using the results of this study, project owners and stakeholders will be able to evaluate the critical preconstruction elements impacting the timing of their projects and prioritize decisions related to the critical elements early on during the preconstruction phase.

KEYWORDS

Preconstruction, time variances, critical preconstruction elements, objective data.

Cite this paper

Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture 19 (2025) 9-21

doi: 10.17265/1934-7359/2025.01.002

References

[1]   Del Puerto, C., Craigie, E., and Gransberg, D. 2016. “Construction Cost Certainty versus Construction Savings: Which Is the Correct Approach?” In 95th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

[2]   Anderson, S., Molenaar, K., and Schexnayder, C. 2007. NCHRP Report 574: Guidance for Cost Estimation and Management for Highway Projects during Planning, Programming, and Preconstruction. Washington, D.C.: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies.

[3]   Craigie, E. K. 2015. “A Framework for Estimating Preconstruction Service Costs at the Functional Level for Highway Construction Projects.” M.Sc. thesis, Iowa State University. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/14752.

[4]   Salary, S. 2021. “Identifying the Impact of Preconstruction Elements on Project Budget and Time Using BIM-Generated Data: Developing a Decision-Making Guideline for Project Owners.” Ph.D. thesis, University of Oklahoma.

[5]   Zou, P. X., Zhang, G., and Wang, J. 2007. “Understanding the Key Risks in Construction Projects in China.” International Journal of Project Management 25 (6): 601-14.

[6]   Tafazzoli, M. 2017. “Dynamic Risk Analysis of Construction Delays Using Fuzzy-Failure Mode Effects Analysis.” Ph.D. thesis, University of Nevada.

[7]   Hampton, G., Baldwin, A. N., and Holt, G. 2012. “Project Delays and Cost: Stakeholder Perceptions of Traditional v. PPP Procurement.” Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction 17 (1): 73-91.

[8]   Braimah, N. 2014. “Understanding Construction Delay Analysis and the Role of Preconstruction Programming”. Journal of Management in Engineering 30 (5): 04014023.

[9]   Yates, J. K., and Eskander, A. 2002. “Construction Total Project Management Planning Issues.” Project Management Journal 33 (1): 37-48.

[10]  Gebrehiwet, T., and Luo, H. 2017. “Analysis of Delay Impact on Construction Project Based on RII and Correlation Coefficient: Empirical Study.” Procedia Engineering 196: 366-74.

[11]  Lopez Del Puerto, C., Costa Agosto, L. G., and Gransberg, D. D. 2016. “A Case for Incorporating Pre-construction Cost Estimating in Construction Engineering and Management Program.” In Proceedings of ASEE’s 123rd Annual Conference and Expositions, New Orleans, LA, June 26-29, 2016.

[12]  Construction Industry Institute. 1999. Development of the Project Definition Rating Index (PDRI) for Building Projects (Research Report 155-11). Austin, TX: Construction Industry Institute.

[13]  Olejnik, S. F. 1984. “Planning Educational Research: Determining the Necessary Sample Size”. The Journal of Experimental Education 53 (1): 40-8.

[14]  Cohen, L., Manion, L., and Morrison, K. 2007. Research Methods in Education (6th ed.). London and New York, NY: Routledge Falmer.

[15]  Delice, A. 2010. “The Sampling Issues in Quantitative Research.” Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice 10 (4): 2001-18.

[16] Hannon, J. J. 2007. “Estimators’ Functional Role Change with BIM.” Presented at the AACE International Transactions, p. IT31.

About | Terms & Conditions | Issue | Privacy | Contact us
Copyright © 2001 - David Publishing Company All rights reserved, www.davidpublisher.com
3 Germay Dr., Unit 4 #4651, Wilmington DE 19804; Tel: 001-302-3943358 Email: [email protected]