 |
[email protected] |
 |
3275638434 |
 |
 |
| Paper Publishing WeChat |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Action Based Approach to Archaeological Reconstruction Projects: Case of the Karnak Temple in Egypt
Anis Semlali
Full-Text PDF
XML 9 Views
DOI:10.17265/1934-7359/2025.01.004
École Supérieure des Sciences et Technologies du Design Tunisia, 2011 Avenue de l`indépendance, Den Den 2011, Tunisia
The proposed paper deals with a numerical approach that could better assist the archaeologist in the archaeological reconstruction projects. The goal of our research is to explore and study the use of computerized tools in archaeological reconstruction projects of monumental architecture in order to propose new ways in which such technology can be used.
Architectural heritage, archaeological reconstruction, process and actions, action-based modeling, architecture and complexity.
Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture 19 (2025) 27-35
doi: 10.17265/1934-7359/2025.01.004
[1] Semlali, A. 2010. Moyens Informatiques de restitution en archéologie monumentale: Cas du temple de Karnak. Thèse de doctorat. Montréal: Université de Montréal.
[2] Tidafi, T. 1996. Moyens pour la communication en architecture: proposition de la modélisation d'actions pour la figuration architecturale. Thèse de doctorat. Montréal: Université de Montréal.
[3] Carlotti, J.-F. 1995. Contribution à l'étude métrologique de quelques monuments du temple d'Amon-Rê à Karnak, Cahier de Karnak, Paris 10: 65-125.
[4] Gardin J.-C. 1979. Une archéologie théorique, Paris, Hachette. French adaptation of the original edition: Archaeological Constructs: An Aspect of Archaeological Theory. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Translated in Russian, 1983: TeoreticheskajaArkheologija. Moscow, Progress.
[5] Gardin, J.-C. 1980. Archaeological Constructs: An Aspect of Theoretical Archaeology, Cambridge Eng. Cambridge University Press.
[6] Gardin, J.-C. 1988. Artificial Intelligence and Expert Systems: Case Studies in the Knowledge Domain of Archaeology. Chichester England New York: Halsted Press.
[7] Le Moigne, J. L. 1990. La modélisation des systèmes complexes, Paris, Dunod.
[8] Reilly, P. 1990. Towards a Virtual Archaeology, In Computer Applications in Archaeology: Edited by K.Lockyear and S.Rahtz. Oxford: British Archaeological reports (Int. Series 565), pp. 133-139.
[9] Salmon, M., and Salmon, W. 1979. Alternative Models of Scientific Explanation, American Anthropologist Washington, D.C, vol. 81, no 81, pp. 61-74.
[10] Salmon, M. H. 1982. Philosophy and Archaeology, Studies in Archaeology. New York, Toronto: Academic Press.
[11] Stutt, A., and Shennan, S. 1992. “Designing a Workbench for Archaeological Argument.” Paper presented at the conference: Archeology and the information age: a global perspective. Volume 1, Part 3 April 1992. New York: Routledge. pp. 288-310.
[12] Meyer, E., Parisel, C., Grussenmeyer, P. Revez, J., and, Tidafi, T. 2006. “A Computerized Solution for Epigraphic Surveys of Egyptian Temples.” Journal Of Archaeological Science 2006, vol. 33, no11, Elsevier, Kidlington, ROYAUME-UNI, pp. 1605-16.