 |
[email protected] |
 |
3275638434 |
 |
 |
| Paper Publishing WeChat |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Isabel Ribau
Full-Text PDF
XML 14 Views
DOI:10.17265/2161-623X/2025.01.004
NOVA Lisbon University, Caparica, Portugal
Chemistry is vital for a society focused on innovation, well-being, and sustainability as it impacts industry, education, and research. In Portugal, students lack interest in chemistry, not only in secondary school but also in higher education. To explore the underlying causes of this phenomenon, this research was undertaken in June 2023. The first phase involved analysing national official databases to identify enrolment patterns in 12th-grade chemistry and related higher education courses over the past decade. The next phase included developing a validated questionnaire with open and closed questions to understand factors influencing students’ choices in higher education chemistry courses. A pilot survey was conducted with bachelor’s students at the NOVA School of Science and Technology, NOVA Lisbon University. This research identifies key factors influencing students’ choices to enroll in chemistry courses, offering insights for policymakers. While 12th-grade enrolment in chemistry has remained steady over the past eight years, enrolment in higher education chemistry courses has declined in the last three years. Key factors affecting student choices include the quality of the secondary chemistry class, the secondary teacher of physics and chemistry, and emotional satisfaction, whereas intellectual accessibility has been identified as a significant barrier.
chemistry, students’ attitudes, science and technology school
Isabel Ribau. (2025). An Exploratory Study Into How Students Perceive Chemistry at a Cutting-Edge Science and Technology Higher Education School. US-China Education Review A, January 2025, Vol. 15, No. 1, 28-42.
Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl and J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action control. SSSP Springer series in social psychology (pp. 11-39). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2
Alsop, S., & Watts, M. (2000). Facts and feelings: Exploring the affective domain in the learning of physics. Physics Education, 35(2), 132-139. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/35/2/311
Alsop, S., & Watts, M. (2003). Science education and affect. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 1043-1047.
Andre, M., & Ludke, M. (1986). Pesquisa em educação: abordagens qualitativas. São Paulo: Epu.
Ardura, D., & Pérez-Bitrián, A. (2019). Motivational pathways towards academic achievement in physics & chemistry: A comparison between students who opt out and those who persist. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 20(3), 618-632.
Ardura, D., & Pérez-Bitrián., A. (2018). The effect of motivation on the choice of chemistry in secondary schools: Adaptation and validation of the science motivation questionnaire II to Spanish students. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(3), 905-918. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1039/C8RP00098K
Ardura, D., Zamora, Á., & Pérez-Bitrián, A. (2021). The role of motivation on secondary school students’ causal attributions to choose or abandon chemistry, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 22(1), 43-61.
Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. Holt: Rinehart and Winston.
Bauer, C. (2008). Attitude toward chemistry: A semantic differential instrument for assessing curriculum impacts. Journal of Chemical Education, 85, 1440-1445.
Benny, N., & Blonder, R. (2018). Interactions of chemistry teachers with gifted students in a regular high-school chemistry classroom. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 1(1), 122-134.
Blonder, R., & Waldman, R. (2019). The role of a WhatsApp group of a professional learning community of chemistry teachers in the development of their knowledge. In Mobile technologies in educational organizations (pp. 117-140). New York: IGI Global, Codex Higher Education. Retrieved from https://dataonderwijs.vlaanderen.be/edulex/document.aspx?docid=14650
Blonder, R., Benny, N., & Jones, M. G. (2014). Teaching self-efficacy of science teachers. In R. Evans, J. Luft, C. Czerniak, and C. Pea (Eds.), The role of science teachers’ beliefs in international classrooms: From teacher actions to student learning (pp. 3-15). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-557-1
Bøe, M. V., Henriksen, E. K., Lyons, T., & Schreiner, C. (2011). Participation in science and technology: Young people’s achievement-related choices in late-modern societies. Studies in Science Education, 47(1), 37-72. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2011.549621
Bodner, G. (1991). I have found you an argument: The conceptual knowledge of beginning chemistry graduate students. Journal of Chemical Education, 68, 385-388.
Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. (2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Bradley, J., & Hutchings, D. (1973). Concepts of science and scientists as factors affecting subject choice in secondary schools. School Science Review, 55(190), 8-15.
Bradley, J. D., & Brand, M. (1985). Stamping out misconceptions. Journal of Chemical Education, 62(4), 318.
Brandriet, A. R., Xu, X., Bretz, S. L., & Lewis, J. E. (2011). Diagnosing changes in attitude in first-year college chemistry students with a shortened version of Bauer’s semantic differential. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 12(2), 271-278.
Chan, J., & Bauer, C. (2014). Identifying at-risk students in general chemistry via cluster analysis of affective characteristics. J. Chem. Educ., 91(9), 1417-1425. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed500170x
Chang, J., & Menke, E. (2022). Measuring attitude toward chemistry, biology, and math at a Hispanic-serving institution. Journal of Chemical Education, 99(4), 1758-1765. doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c01109
Cheung, D. (2009). Developing a scale to measure students’ attitudes toward chemistry lessons. International Journal of Science Education, 31(16), 2185-2203. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802189799
Cleaves, A. (2005). The formation of science choices in secondary school. Int. J. Sci. Educ., 27(4), 471-486.
De Jong, O., Blonder, R., & Oversby, J. (2013). How to balance chemistry education between observing phenomena and thinking in models. In I. Eilks, and A. Hofstein (Eds.), Teaching chemistry—A studybook (pp. 97-126). Roterdam/Taipei: Sense Publishers.
Easa, E., & Blonder, R. (2022). Development and validation of customized pedagogical kits for high-school chemistry teaching and learning: The redox reaction example. Chemistry Teacher International, 4(1), 71-95. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1515/cti-2021-0022
Easa, E., & Blonder, R. (2024). Fostering inclusive learning: Customized kits in chemistry education and their influence on self-efficacy, attitudes and achievements. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 25, 1175-1196. doi:10.1039/d4rp00144c
Eberlein, T., Kampmeier, J., & Minderhout, V. (2008). Pedagogies of engagement in science: A comparison of PBL, POGIL, and PLTL. Biochem Mol Biol Educ., 36(4), 262-273. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20204
Garnett, P. J., Garnett, P. J., & Hackling, M. W. (1995). Students’ alternative conceptions in chemistry: A review of research and implications for teaching and learning. Studies in Science Education, 25(1), 69-96. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/03057269508560050
George, R. (2000). Measuring change in students’ attitudes toward science over time: An application of latent variable growth modeling. J. Sci. Educ. and Technol., 9(3), 213-225.
Hartman, J. R., Nelson, E. A., & Kirschner, P. A. (2022). Improving student success in chemistry through cognitive science. Foundations of Chemistry, 24(2), 239-261. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s10698-022-09427-w
Johnstone, A. H. (1974). Evaluation of chemistry syllabuses in Scotland. Studies in Science Education, 1, 21-49.
Johnstone, A. H. (1984). New stars for the teacher to steer by? Journal of Chemical Education, 61(10), 847-849.
Johnstone, A. H. (1991). Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 7(2), 75-83. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.1991.tb00230.x
Johnstone, A. H. (2000). Teaching of chemistry-logical or psychological? Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 1(1), 9-15.
Johnstone, A. H. (2010). You can’t get there from here. Journal of Chemical Education, 7, 22-29.
Kahveci, M. (2015a). Assessing high school students’ attitudes toward chemistry with a shortened semantic differential. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16, 283-292.
Kahveci, M. (2015b). Majors’ gender-based affective states toward learning physical chemistry. In M. Kahveci and M. Orgill (Eds.), Affective dimensions in chemistry education (pp. 297-318). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45085-7_15
Kan, A., & Akbas, A. (2006). Affective factors that influence chemistry achievement (attitude and self-efficacy) and the power of these factors to predict chemistry achievement-I. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 3(1), 76-85.
Kousa, P., & Aksela, M. (2019). The needs for successful chemistry teaching in diverse classes: Teachers’ beliefs and practices, LUMAT. Int. J. Math, Sci. Technol. Educ., 7(1), 79-100.
Kousa, P., Kavonius, R., & Aksela, M. (2018). Low-achieving students’ attitudes towards learning chemistry and chemistry teaching methods. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(2), 431-441. doi:10.1039/C7RP00226B
Marchak, D., Shvarts-Serebro, I., & Blonder, R. (2021a). Crafting molecular geometries: Implications of neuro-pedagogy for teaching chemical content. Journal of Chemical Education, 98, 1321-1327.
Marchak, D., Shvarts-Serebro, I., & Blonder, R. (2021b). Teaching chemistry by a creative approach: Adapting a teachers’ course for active remote learning. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(9), 2809-2819. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c01341
Matuk, C. F., Linn, M. C., & Eylon, B. S. (2015). Technology to support teachers using evidence from student work to customize technology-enhanced inquiry units. Instructional Science, 43(2), 229-257. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-014-9338-1
Metsämuuronen, J., & Tuohilampi, L. (2014). Changes in achievement in and attitude toward mathematics of the Finnish children from grade 0 to 9—A longitudinal study. Australian Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 4(2), 145-169. doi:10.5539/jedp.v4n2p145
Murray, S., Huie, R., Lewis, R., Balicki, S., Clinchot, M., Banks, G., Talanquer, V., & Sevian. S. (2020). Teachers’ noticing, interpreting, and acting on students’ chemical ideas in written work. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(10), 3478-3489. doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b01198
Orgill, M., Killedar, M., York, A., & Lamm, M. H. (2021). Teacher beliefs and practices surrounding underrepresented students in chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(8), 1247-1277. doi:10.1002/tea.21689
Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049-1079. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000032199
Ozel, M., Caglak, S., & Erdogan, M. (2013). Are affective factors a good predictor of science achievement? Examining the role of affective factors based on PISA 2006. Learning and Individual Differences, 24, 73-82.
Palmer, T.-A., Burke, P. F., & Aubusson, P. (2017). Why school students choose and reject science: A study of the factors that students consider when selecting subjects. International Journal of Science Education, 39(6), 645-662.
Potvin, P., & Hasni, A. (2014). Interest, motivation and attitude towards science and technology at K-12 levels: A systematic review of 12 years of educational research. Studies in Science Education, 50(1), 85-129.
Reid, N. (2006). Thoughts on attitude measurement. Research in Science and Technological Education, 24, 3-27.
Ribau, I. (2020). Practical work by laboratory stations: An innovation in experimental work. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(1), 17-26. doi:10.13189/ujer.2020.080103
Ribau, I. (2022). Engaging students in chemistry and physics with an active methodology. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 9(12), 488-508. doi:10.14738/assrj.912.13708
Ribau, I. (2024). Alunos em química precisam-se. Boletim SPQ, 173(48), 74-76. doi:10.52590/M3.P710.A30002809
Rocabado, G., Kilpatrick, N., Mooring, S., & Lewis, J. (2019). Can we compare attitude scores among diverse populations? An exploration of measurement invariance testing to support valid comparisons between black female students and their peers in an organic chemistry course. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(11), 2371-2382. doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00516
Shirazi, S. (2017). Student experience of school science. International Journal of Science Education, 39(14), 1891-1912. doi:10.1080/09500693.2017.1356943
Simpson, R., & Oliver, J. (1990). A summary of major influences on attitude toward and achievement in science among adolescent students. Science Education, 74(1), 1-18.
Sirhan, G. (2007). Learning difficulties in chemistry: An overview. Journal of Turkish Science Education (TUSED), 4, 2-20.
Skryabina, E. (2000). Students’ attitudes to learning physics at school and university levels in Scotland (PhD thesis, University of Glasgow, 2000).
Smyth, E., & Hannan, C. (2006). School effects and subject choice: The uptake of scientific subjects in Ireland. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(3), 303-327.
Solbes J. (2011). Por qué disminuye el alumnado de ciencias? Alambique. Didáctica de las ciencias experimentales, 67, 53-61.
Tümay, H. (2016). Reconsidering learning difficulties and misconceptions in chemistry: Emergence in chemistry and its implications for chemical education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17, 229-245.
Ulriksen L., Madsen L. M., & Holmegaard H. T. (2010). What do we know about explanations for drop out/opt out among young people from STM higher education programmes? Stud. Sci. Educ., 46(2), 209-244.
Vishnumolakala, V. R., Southam, D. C., Treagust, D. F., Mocerino, M., & Qureshi, S. (2017). Students’ attitudes, self-efficacy and experiences in a modified process-oriented guided inquiry learning undergraduate chemistry classroom. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18(2), 340-352. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RP00233A
White, R. T. (1988). Learning science. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Xu, X., & Lewis, J. E. (2011). Refinement of a chemistry attitude measure for college students. Journal of Chemical Education, 88(5), 561-568. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1021/ed900071q
Xu, X., Villafane, S. M., & Lewis, J. E. (2013). College students’ attitudes toward chemistry, conceptual knowledge and achievement: structural equation model analysis. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14(2), 188-200. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1039/C3RP20170H
Yin, R. K. (2012). Case study methods. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, and K. J. Sher (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 2. Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 141-155). New York: American Psychological Association. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-009