![]() |
[email protected] |
![]() |
3275638434 |
![]() |
![]() |
| Paper Publishing WeChat |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Risk-Based Evaluation of Longitudinal Ventilation with Enhanced Safety Concept
Göran Nygren
Full-Text PDF
XML 13 Views
DOI:10.17265/1934-7359/2025.09.003
Brandingenjör & Civilingenjör i Riskhantering, WSP Brand & Risk, 111 64 STOCKHOLM, Sweden
The longitudinal ventilation strategy is commonly used for road tunnels in urban environment in Sweden. This is partly due to how tunnels in urban environment was planned and designed before the EU Directive (2004/54/EC) came in place. Even in new tunnels both to practical and economic reasons the use of longitudinal ventilation has been an outspoken demand from the Swedish road authority, SRA. Swedish law requires that a risk analysis is carried out to demonstrate that an acceptable level of risk is achieved in the tunnels with longitudinal ventilation if there is a risk of queues. Otherwise transverse or semi-transverse ventilation strategy shall be used. During recent development, or a late awakening, it is clear that dense populated areas in Sweden will experience queues. This threatens the foundation of the Swedish modern tunnel safety concept which calls for enhancement. This paper presents the risk-reducing effect of three alternative strategies, enhancements package, focusing on evacuation safety for road users. It is a combination of traffic management, fixed firefighting systems, reduced distance between escape routes and regulation of traffic with dangerous goods. In addition, it provides a comprehensive review of safety system details, combined with a longitudinal ventilation concept.
Longitudinal ventilation, queue, risk assessment, risk mitigation measures, safety concept.
Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture 19 (2025) 433-443
doi: 10.17265/1934-7359/2025.09.003
[1] Boverkets föreskrift och allmänna råd om säkerhet i vägtunnlar, BFS 2007:11. (in Swedish)
[2] Besluts PM Säkerhetskoncept (0S148202), E4 Förbifart Stockholm, Trafikverket, 2010.
[3] Allmän teknisk beskrivning för vägtunnlar, Tunnel 99, VV Publ 1999:138.
[4] Allmän teknisk beskrivning för vägtunnlar, Tunnel 2004, VV Publ 2004:124.
[5] Förutsättningar för hög trafiksäkerhet (0T14S0000),E4 Förbifart Stockholm, Arbetsplan, Vägverket,2010.
[6] Lag om säkerhet i vägtunnlar, SFS 2006:418.
[7] Brandskyddshandboken, Rapport 3134, Brandteknik, Lunds Tekniska Högskola, 2005.
[8] Riskanalysmetoder – Delprojekt 2.2, bilaga till regeringsuppdrag Personsäkerhet i tunnlar, Boverket, 2005.
[9] Riskanalys för driftskedet - Bränder i fordon och farligt gods-olycka i tunnel (0S148201), Trafikverket, 2010.
[10] ADR-S, Statens räddningsverks föreskrifter (SRVFS 2006:7) om transport av farligt gods på väg och i terräng, Statens Räddningsverk, 2006.
[11] Konsekvensanalys - Brand i fordon (0S149401), E4 Förbifart Stockholm, Trafikverket, 2010.




