![]() |
[email protected] |
![]() |
3275638434 |
![]() |
![]() |
| Paper Publishing WeChat |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Cruz García Lirios, Francisco Rubén Sandoval Vázquez, Wilfrido Isidro Aldana Balderas, Julio E. Crespo
Full-Text PDF
XML 33 Views
DOI:10.17265/2160-6579/2026.02.002
Universidad de la Salud, Mexico City, Mexico Universidad Autonoma del Estado de Morelos, Cuernavaca City, Mexico University of Los Lagos, Chile
Environmental beliefs play a fundamental role in shaping individual responses to environmental challenges and sustainability transitions. In Latin America, environmental problems such as climate change, biodiversity loss, and resource degradation have intensified the need to understand the psychological and cognitive factors that influence environmentally responsible behavior. The present study analyzes the structural relationships among environmental concern, ecocentric values, environmental awareness, and pro-environmental behavior through the estimation of a Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Model (PLS-SEM). A quantitative, non-experimental, and cross-sectional design was implemented using survey data collected through a structured questionnaire composed of reflective indicators measured on a Likert scale. The measurement model evaluated reliability, convergent validity, and discriminant validity through outer loadings, composite reliability, and average variance extracted. The structural model was assessed using path coefficients, bootstrapping procedures, and model fit indicators, including the standardized root mean square residual and the normed fit index. The results indicate that environmental concern and ecocentric values significantly influence environmental awareness, while environmental awareness emerges as the strongest predictor of pro-environmental behavior. Additionally, ecocentric values demonstrate both direct and indirect effects on behavioral engagement. The model explains a substantial proportion of variance in environmental awareness and pro-environmental behavior, confirming that environmental beliefs operate through an integrated system of emotional, normative, and cognitive components. These findings highlight the importance of strengthening environmental awareness and ecological value orientations in order to promote sustainable behavioral practices. The study contributes to the literature on environmental psychology and sustainability by providing empirical evidence of the structural mechanisms linking environmental beliefs with pro-environmental behavior in the Latin American context.
environmental beliefs, environmental concern, ecocentric values, environmental awareness, pro-environmental behavior, PLS-SEM; sustainability, Latin America.
Ajzen, M. (1991). The theory of planned behavior.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Bamberg, S., & Möser, G. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour..Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(1), 14-25. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.12.002
Byrne, B. (2016).Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming, New York: Routledge. doi:https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315757421
Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. InModern methods for business research(Chapter 10). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. doi:https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410604385
Clayton, S., & Myers, G. (2015).Conservation psychology: Understanding and promoting human care for nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118521373
Dietz, T., Fitzgerald, A., & Shwom, R. (2005). Environmental values.Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30, 335-372. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144444
Dunlap, R., Van Liere, K., Mertig, A., & Jones, R. (2000). Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale.Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 425-442. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00176
Gifford, R., & Nilsson, A. (2014). Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behaviour.International Journal of Psychology, 49(3), 141-157. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12034
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017).A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM).London: SAGE Publications. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7
Henseler, J., Dijkstra, T. K., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Diamantopoulos, A., Straub, D., … Calantone, R. J. (2014). Common beliefs and reality about PLS.Organizational Research Methods, 17(2), 182-209. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114526928
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
Kaiser, M., Ranney, O., Hartig, T., & Bowler, P. (1999). Ecological behavior, environmental attitude, and feelings of responsibility for the environment.European Psychologist, 4(2), 59-74. doi:https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.4.2.59
Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J. M. (2015).SmartPLS 3. Boenningstedt: SmartPLS GmbH. doi:https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4298.0885
Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2017). Partial least squares structural equation modeling. InHandbook of market research(pp. 1-40). Cham: Springer. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05542-8_15-1
Schultz, P. W. (2001). The structure of environmental concern: Concern for self, other people, and the biosphere.Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(4), 327-339. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2001.0227
Steg, N., & Steg, L. (2014). Values, norms, and intrinsic motivation to act proenvironmentally.Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 39, 181-207. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-032713-095935
Stern, P. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior.Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407-424. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00175
Van der Werff, E., Steg, L., & Keizer, K. (2013). It is a moral issue: The relationship between environmental self-identity, obligation-based intrinsic motivation and pro-environmental behaviour.Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 1258-1265. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.018




